You Can Steal a Gate
But don’t take offence. We may need it.
Last year the Blue Jays scored 775 runs. This was above average in the American League. However, as has been well publicized, the Fighting Jays were very fortunate to have scored that many runs. Baseball Prospectus estimates that based on our offensive production, we should have scored only 743 runs. That boils down to a positive differential of 32 runs between our actual runs scored and the amount of runs we would have been expected to score based on our offensive performance. 32 just happened to be the second highest positive differential between actual runs and expected runs in the major leagues last year (in case you’re curious, the largest positive differential was
If the Blue Jays wish to live up to
I figure the line up versus righties, not necessarily in order, will be:
Likewise versus lefties:
Johnson, Hill, Wells, Glaus, Hillenbrand, Molina, Rios, Overbay,
2006 Blue Jays Offensive Profile
| | EQA in 2005 | 3 yr OPS vs. Left | Vs. Right | |
| Russ Adams | 0.259 | 0.584 | 0.762 | |
| Frank Catalanotto | 0.289 | 0.598 | 0.832 | |
| | 0.272 | 0.992 | 0.783 | |
| Troy Glaus | 0.292 | 0.894 | 0.862 | |
| | 0.282 | 0.798 | 0.836 | |
| Shea Hillenbrand | 0.279 | 0.869 | 0.767 | |
| Aaron Hill | 0.265 | 0.821 | 0.689 | |
| Greg Zaun | 0.265 | 0.727 | 0.728 | |
| Eric Hinske | 0.271 | 0.692 | 0.751 | |
| Bengie Molina | 0.282 | 0.889 | 0.692 | |
| Alexis Rios | 0.249 | 0.703 | 0.714 | |
| Reed Johnson | 0.261 | 0.806 | 0.702 | |
| John McDonald | 0.249 | 0.586 | 0.587 | |
| | | | | |
| Avg. | 0.271 | 0.766 | 0.747 | |
| Projected Starters | XXX | 0.806 | 0.779 (0.775) | |
Newest Ex-Jays
| | EQA in 2005 | 3 yr OPS vs. Left | Vs. Right |
| Corey Koskie | 0.263 | 0.647 | 0.892 |
| Ken Huckaby | 0.187 | 0.621 | 0.381 |
| | 0.261 | 0.616 | 0.785 |
| Frank Menechino | 0.258 | 0.822 | 0.693 |
| | | | |
| Avg. | 0.242 | 0.677 | 0.688 |
I’m sure it is no surprise to see that our line up projects to be stronger versus left handed pitching. Also of note, is that the cumulative .271 EQA would have placed the Jays in fourth place, just a head of the Cleveland Indians. We would have trailed division rivals the Yanks (0.276), Red Sox (0.274) and the Reds (0.272). That however, is completely arbitrary and should be taken with several grains of salt.
There are several factors which will affect the success of the Jay’s offense. I have highlighted just a few here:
- Continued development of young players. It is unlikely that the Jays will be a play off team if all three of Adams, Hill and Rios perform as they did last year. Just how good is Hill? Can Rios put his tools for good use? Is
- Hinske’s new stance… Again. Last year was a positive step for Hinske in which he regained some effectiveness in facing right handed pitching. As it stands, our offence will need him to continue this trend. We know he has the potential. It’s just matter of him putting it together.
- Wells has a lot in common with Hinske. In addition to being Hinske’s contractual brethren, he has also been unable to live up to the promise shown early in his career. With a clean bill of health Glaus batting behind him Wells is out of excuses.
- The heart of the order should be much improved over last year as Glaus and Overbay will provide some much needed pop in the middle of the line up. They will have to do much better than Koskie and Shea did last year if the Jays hope to compete for the post season.
So what do you think about the new and improved offense?

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home